Calvin Klein Hit With Criticism Over Pregnant Transgender Man Campaign

What’s the issue? If you don’t like it, don’t look at the image?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 71July 11, 2022 12:40 AM

Remember when CK used to use beautiful models in their campaigns? I miss those beautiful CK models.

by Anonymousreply 1May 14, 2022 4:38 PM

So passé. Where are the transhumans? I want pregnant cyborgs in my CK ads.

by Anonymousreply 2May 14, 2022 4:43 PM

Men don’t get pregnant. Pregnancy is not part of the cis male experience, it’s part of the cis female experience.

If you are a trans man that wants to get pregnant, you lose your male card. At best, you may be non-binary, but you are no longer a trans man.

by Anonymousreply 3May 14, 2022 4:57 PM

Encouraging women to chop their tits off is disgusting.

by Anonymousreply 4May 14, 2022 5:10 PM

[QUOTE]Today, in support of women and mothers all over the world, we’re spotlighting the realities of new families

By featuring someone who denies that they are a woman, and therefore would presumably also reject the label of ‘mother’.

by Anonymousreply 5May 14, 2022 5:29 PM

If I could afford Calvin Klein I would immediately stop buying it and I urge all LG people to do so to and help stop the spread of the Trans Scourge

Thank you for posting this OP and keep up the good work Gay Warriors!!!

by Anonymousreply 6May 14, 2022 5:31 PM

Circus Sideshow chic is so 2014.

by Anonymousreply 7May 14, 2022 5:32 PM

So fucking gross. Both of them.

by Anonymousreply 8May 16, 2022 12:42 AM

[quote] If you don’t like it, don’t look at the image?

By its nature advertising will place the image and message where the targeted people will have to look. Whether they want to or not.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 9May 16, 2022 12:49 AM

So, SOMETHING comes between ze and zer jeans.

by Anonymousreply 10May 16, 2022 12:51 AM

[quote]Pregnancy is not part of the cis male experience, it’s part of the cis female experience.

Cis? There is no such word. We do not adopt the language of the mentally ill.

by Anonymousreply 11May 16, 2022 12:53 AM

How is it possible for their to get pregnant with the hormones?

by Anonymousreply 12May 16, 2022 12:53 AM

I wonder if they stop taking hormones for long enough to get pregnant then start taking them again.

I would think it's dangerous to the baby to be taking T when it's mostly female hormones doing the work to support the pregnancy.

Why does someone who goes to the trouble to "become a man" then decide to get pregnant and have a baby? You gonna shout down every word you don't like then turn around and do the one thing that defines you as woman?

by Anonymousreply 13May 16, 2022 12:58 AM

This is disgusting to look at.

I'm sorry, but that's the truth. These are people trying to make a damned spectacle of themselves

by Anonymousreply 14May 16, 2022 1:00 AM

I keep telling myself this discussion will go away like all fads go away. I’m starting to wonder, though. I might have to finally go so far as to look up what’s meant by “transman.”

1–Person born male who changed to female?

2–Vice versa?

I’ve looked up “cis” and the definition never sticks because the only place I ever see it used is when I read Dan Savage’s column, where each of his poor troubled sex-havers (or hopefuls) seem to need an entire paragraph just to describe what they ARE before they can explain who they’re hoping to bone or be boned by or piss on or break up with or whatever.

While I personally find it unconscionable that anyone would make a new child when there’s is even one left sitting and waiting to be adopted. But I’m sure that’s considered beside the point amidst all the excitement over the big issues such as whether or not this advertisement increases sales of Calvin Klein underwear.

by Anonymousreply 15May 16, 2022 1:02 AM

Trans men are female also known as trans identified females. (TIF)

Trans “women” are trans identified males (TIM)

by Anonymousreply 16May 16, 2022 1:04 AM

100 years ago, these people would have been in circuses/carnivals, but liberals got rid of the side shows by the 1960s.

by Anonymousreply 17May 16, 2022 1:33 AM

How these deranged hetero frankensteins are lumped with the LGBs? Disgusting.

#DroptheT

by Anonymousreply 18May 16, 2022 2:17 AM

CK is going to destroy their image if they keep using these controversial/revolting ads. Why risk it?

by Anonymousreply 19May 16, 2022 2:20 AM

How reckless to get pregnant while transitioning.

Off-the-charts narcissism.

by Anonymousreply 20May 16, 2022 2:21 AM

They (self-proclaimed men, or non-women) only temporarily stops taking T just to get pregnant. But it's still in their body. Later in their breast* milk too. Babies get exposed to the toxic mess from the start.

by Anonymousreply 21May 16, 2022 2:48 AM

Love CK. They also have the best sales.

by Anonymousreply 22May 16, 2022 2:55 AM

I feel sorry for the baby having to suck from the mercury-poisoned tattooed lady -- or whatever she/he/they is.

by Anonymousreply 23May 16, 2022 3:00 AM

Causing people to notice and discuss ones adverts are their sole purpose -- so I suppose CK has been successful here...?

by Anonymousreply 24May 16, 2022 3:08 AM

Fucking a guy with a pussy isn't gay, right?

by Anonymousreply 25May 16, 2022 12:21 PM

I'm assuming they took out the milk glands, so there will be no suckling done.

by Anonymousreply 26May 16, 2022 12:33 PM

I bet the baby will be "born Trans" as well.

by Anonymousreply 27May 16, 2022 12:42 PM

R27 They'll have a gender reveal complete with protestors.

by Anonymousreply 28May 16, 2022 12:44 PM

Trans parents will have parties to reveal which gender they've chosen for their child.

by Anonymousreply 29May 16, 2022 12:53 PM

[quote] Fucking a guy with a pussy isn't gay, right?

Guys don't have pussies. Gals do. So no, fucking a gal isn't gay.

In its rush for profit and visibility, Calvin Klein has jumped on the translunacy juggernaut hell-bent on obliterating women and gays. SHAME!!

by Anonymousreply 30May 16, 2022 1:14 PM

R30 Got it - just have to make sure I'm goin' in the front door!

by Anonymousreply 31May 16, 2022 1:17 PM

Remember when modeling agencies used to scout the American Heartland for gorgeous models? Now they have nothing but contempt for Middle America.

Thank God for the Internet/social media! Otherwise, these beauties would remain hidden, because the agencies now seem to only want to represent unconventional/grotesque people.

by Anonymousreply 32May 16, 2022 1:24 PM

Glad to see others here perplexed about the hideous models today. When and why did this change? Does anybody actually want to see grotesquely ugly people every time they open a magazine?

by Anonymousreply 34May 16, 2022 1:35 PM

everything is planned division right from the start these days. men vs. women, straight vs. gay, cis vs, trans, right vs. left, race vs. race, religion vs. ______. classic divide and conquer, and ordinary people are too mediocre to even notice.

"When evidence forces certain people to reverse their position they behave is if they were right all along. I’m beginning to think their confusion is genuine—like they imagine their shift in belief must be due to the truth itself having changed rather than them arriving at it late "

by Anonymousreply 35May 16, 2022 1:39 PM

Their idea of supporting women and mothers is by erasing them and pretending men can get pregnant when they can't? Fucking disgusting.

by Anonymousreply 36May 16, 2022 1:42 PM

R27 - I think you mean 'assigned trans at birth' or whatever bullshit they've come up with this week

by Anonymousreply 37May 16, 2022 3:33 PM

"We're raising it not to see gender."

by Anonymousreply 38May 16, 2022 6:10 PM

Better teach it to never look down in the shower, R38. They might see their gender! The could cause suicidal ideation!

by Anonymousreply 39May 17, 2022 3:58 AM

I like the ones that are already knocked up, so I don't have to worry about it!

Sorry junior, Marky likes to bottom out! You might want to duck or something!

by Anonymousreply 40May 17, 2022 4:21 AM

15 years too late, Bitches!

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 41May 17, 2022 4:43 AM

So this trans thing insist she's a man yet want to belong in "Mother's Day" too?

She's wants her trans cake and eat it too.

by Anonymousreply 42May 17, 2022 4:45 AM

So this is what it sounds like when bigots cry.

by Anonymousreply 43May 17, 2022 4:59 AM

Getting pregnant is probably the most "female affirming" thing you can do. How on earth does this not trigger this person's gender dysphoria? People with actual gender dysphoria (which is cured by therapy training them to [bold]accept[/bold] their actual gender) usually reject anything that defines them as the gender that they actually are. What can be more female-defining than getting pregnant? This is very confusing.

by Anonymousreply 44May 17, 2022 5:00 AM

The mental gymnastics to rationalize this must be astounding, it is definitely confusing. I’ve stopped trying to understand any of it. Now they will be raising babies. I’d love to get an invite to the gender reveal party. Imagine the poor SOB that has to break the news during the ultrasound. They is giving birth to it. Delicious.

by Anonymousreply 45May 17, 2022 5:06 AM

R41 Kinda old, but I'll do him ... WTF, this is the back door!

by Anonymousreply 46May 17, 2022 5:13 AM

1. How is she what looks like at least 6 months pregnant but still maintaining a full beard? She's harming her baby becasue of her mental illness.

2. Is it the non-pregnant partner breastfeeding in the picture a little way down the article? How's that working? Or is that partner just pretending to feed the baby because reality doesn't pertain to this arrangement?

Fucking psychos.

by Anonymousreply 47May 17, 2022 5:28 AM

Let me suggest that testosterone shots are not a good idea if you're pregnant with an XX child.

by Anonymousreply 48May 17, 2022 5:34 AM

I wanna see some of these babies, after all the hormones have been pumped into them.

by Anonymousreply 49May 17, 2022 5:36 AM

[quote] Remember when CK used to use beautiful models in their campaigns?

What I remember about CK campaigns is that they have always tried to do the most predictably controversial thing possible, in order to capitalize on the latest moral panic for publicity reasons. It worked with the child porn-styles campaign and weren't they doing it back in the day putting a very young Brooke Shields in their jeans and having her insinuate that she was panty-less?

Everyone losing their minds here is reacting exactly as hoped by the CK advertising agency.

by Anonymousreply 50May 17, 2022 5:45 AM

r44 It's no longer a "female" thing. Pregnancy, abortions, breastfeeding, etc. They have been successfully distorting the language and concepts.

by Anonymousreply 51May 17, 2022 5:51 AM

No they haven't. Some crazies on social media (the same as you, R51, just different beliefs they're acting crazy about) are arguing to change the language. It has not been accepted by the mainstream and will not be. No need to panic.

by Anonymousreply 52May 17, 2022 5:56 AM

R47, the partner is MTF so can’t really breastfeed.

by Anonymousreply 53May 17, 2022 6:28 AM

r52 Is New York Times part of "some crazies on social media"? If this man is a "female", then by the same logic, that mutilated, mentally ill pregnant person is a male... or at least "not female". Hence so many politicians and other liberal types' desperate enthusiasm to remove the word woman (and female) from all these things.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 54May 17, 2022 6:37 AM

[quote] It has not been accepted by the mainstream and will not be.

R52 Only a matter of time, due to on-going media, government, academia and community organisations social inculcation of translunacy terminology, such as "transitioning", "transgender", "transman", "transwoman", "cis-gender", etc. As well as the normalization of men in dresses as "women" and men who demand to be called women because it's Tuesday and they "feel like women".

by Anonymousreply 55May 17, 2022 6:37 AM

r52 Or this Washington Post? "Levine is also the organization’s first-ever [bold]female[/bold] four-star admiral."

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 56May 17, 2022 6:38 AM

As R54 R56 posted, not only are the "liberal" media promoting translunacy, but they're defending it against criticism as well.

From The Independent, 2 April 2022:

"Critics accuse trans swimming star Lia Thomas of having an unfair advantage. The data tells a different story."

by Anonymousreply 57May 17, 2022 6:46 AM

Addendum R57 "The NCAA champion has sparked controversy and become a hate figure among conservatives, but statistics show little evidence that [bold]she[/bold] performed any differently to other [bold]women[/bold], Io Dodds reports"

by Anonymousreply 58May 17, 2022 6:48 AM

Oh never mind. Is @The White House part of "some crazies on social media"?

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 59May 17, 2022 6:49 AM

Wouldn’t it be correct to say first woman officer instead of first female officer? Woman is gender, female is sex.

by Anonymousreply 60May 17, 2022 8:29 AM

It depends on the position of Venus at that particular time but only on the 3rd Sunday of every lunar month, r60.

by Anonymousreply 61May 17, 2022 8:45 AM

I can't wait for the video of their child coming out as trans to it's joyous parents.

by Anonymousreply 62May 17, 2022 9:11 AM

This MTF is a retired lt colonel and a billionaire.

Offsite Link
by Anonymousreply 63May 17, 2022 11:03 AM

R3 Agreed.

Trans men who get pregnant is a contradiction of being trans because obviously you weren’t born in the wrong body if you want to be pregnant and birth children.

by Anonymousreply 64May 17, 2022 11:09 AM

It's not gay if I start to think about putting my baby in them, is it?

by Anonymousreply 66May 18, 2022 8:49 AM

R37, ITA. I can’t believe they still harp on with the “assigned ___ at birth” horseshit. Sex is observed and recorded in the womb, as it is with every pregnancy, ever. A woman can’t just birth a baby and decide whether it’s a boy or girl regardless of genitals. Just another example of their lunacy.

R44, agree with your entire post. And I agree with so many points raised by every other sane reasonable person here. I would love to give credit to everyone individually, but I’m going to credit all of the sane ones who agree that ONLY WOMEN GET PREGNANT!!

This lunacy needs to be stopped.

by Anonymousreply 67May 18, 2022 9:12 AM

[quote] ONLY WOMEN GET PREGNANT!!

womxm

by Anonymousreply 68May 18, 2022 9:15 AM

r68 I thought you were joking... Ok this is the real latest news

by Anonymousreply 69May 18, 2022 9:19 AM

[quote] This MTF is a retired lt colonel and a billionaire.

Not to mention a complete stunner!

by Anonymousreply 71July 11, 2022 12:40 AM

ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7pa3TmqOorZ6csm%2BvzqZmraCimq6le5Jpb2txZ2h%2Bbq%2FApa2ipl2guaa1zWafoqxdrLa1tIycqaKsmZi2tLmMqK2eql2lv6azzZqlrWWkp66vv8aepZ2domK6orqMnJimqJGetK8%3D