Calvin Klein Hit With Criticism Over Pregnant Transgender Man Campaign

What’s the issue? If you don’t like it, don’t look at the image?

Remember when CK used to use beautiful models in their campaigns? I miss those beautiful CK models.

So passé. Where are the transhumans? I want pregnant cyborgs in my CK ads.

Men don’t get pregnant. Pregnancy is not part of the cis male experience, it’s part of the cis female experience.

If you are a trans man that wants to get pregnant, you lose your male card. At best, you may be non-binary, but you are no longer a trans man.

Encouraging women to chop their tits off is disgusting.

[QUOTE]Today, in support of women and mothers all over the world, we’re spotlighting the realities of new families

By featuring someone who denies that they are a woman, and therefore would presumably also reject the label of ‘mother’.

If I could afford Calvin Klein I would immediately stop buying it and I urge all LG people to do so to and help stop the spread of the Trans Scourge

Thank you for posting this OP and keep up the good work Gay Warriors!!!

Circus Sideshow chic is so 2014.

So fucking gross. Both of them.

[quote] If you don’t like it, don’t look at the image?

By its nature advertising will place the image and message where the targeted people will have to look. Whether they want to or not.

So, SOMETHING comes between ze and zer jeans.

[quote]Pregnancy is not part of the cis male experience, it’s part of the cis female experience.

Cis? There is no such word. We do not adopt the language of the mentally ill.

How is it possible for their to get pregnant with the hormones?

I wonder if they stop taking hormones for long enough to get pregnant then start taking them again.

I would think it's dangerous to the baby to be taking T when it's mostly female hormones doing the work to support the pregnancy.

Why does someone who goes to the trouble to "become a man" then decide to get pregnant and have a baby? You gonna shout down every word you don't like then turn around and do the one thing that defines you as woman?

This is disgusting to look at.

I'm sorry, but that's the truth. These are people trying to make a damned spectacle of themselves

I keep telling myself this discussion will go away like all fads go away. I’m starting to wonder, though. I might have to finally go so far as to look up what’s meant by “transman.”

1–Person born male who changed to female?

2–Vice versa?

I’ve looked up “cis” and the definition never sticks because the only place I ever see it used is when I read Dan Savage’s column, where each of his poor troubled sex-havers (or hopefuls) seem to need an entire paragraph just to describe what they ARE before they can explain who they’re hoping to bone or be boned by or piss on or break up with or whatever.

While I personally find it unconscionable that anyone would make a new child when there’s is even one left sitting and waiting to be adopted. But I’m sure that’s considered beside the point amidst all the excitement over the big issues such as whether or not this advertisement increases sales of Calvin Klein underwear.

Trans men are female also known as trans identified females. (TIF)

Trans “women” are trans identified males (TIM)

100 years ago, these people would have been in circuses/carnivals, but liberals got rid of the side shows by the 1960s.

How these deranged hetero frankensteins are lumped with the LGBs? Disgusting.

#DroptheT

CK is going to destroy their image if they keep using these controversial/revolting ads. Why risk it?

How reckless to get pregnant while transitioning.

Off-the-charts narcissism.

They (self-proclaimed men, or non-women) only temporarily stops taking T just to get pregnant. But it's still in their body. Later in their breast* milk too. Babies get exposed to the toxic mess from the start.

Love CK. They also have the best sales.

I feel sorry for the baby having to suck from the mercury-poisoned tattooed lady -- or whatever she/he/they is.

Causing people to notice and discuss ones adverts are their sole purpose -- so I suppose CK has been successful here...?

Fucking a guy with a pussy isn't gay, right?

I'm assuming they took out the milk glands, so there will be no suckling done.

I bet the baby will be "born Trans" as well.

R27 They'll have a gender reveal complete with protestors.

Trans parents will have parties to reveal which gender they've chosen for their child.

[quote] Fucking a guy with a pussy isn't gay, right?

Guys don't have pussies. Gals do. So no, fucking a gal isn't gay.

In its rush for profit and visibility, Calvin Klein has jumped on the translunacy juggernaut hell-bent on obliterating women and gays. SHAME!!

R30 Got it - just have to make sure I'm goin' in the front door!

Remember when modeling agencies used to scout the American Heartland for gorgeous models? Now they have nothing but contempt for Middle America.

Thank God for the Internet/social media! Otherwise, these beauties would remain hidden, because the agencies now seem to only want to represent unconventional/grotesque people.

Glad to see others here perplexed about the hideous models today. When and why did this change? Does anybody actually want to see grotesquely ugly people every time they open a magazine?

everything is planned division right from the start these days. men vs. women, straight vs. gay, cis vs, trans, right vs. left, race vs. race, religion vs. ______. classic divide and conquer, and ordinary people are too mediocre to even notice.

"When evidence forces certain people to reverse their position they behave is if they were right all along. I’m beginning to think their confusion is genuine—like they imagine their shift in belief must be due to the truth itself having changed rather than them arriving at it late "

Their idea of supporting women and mothers is by erasing them and pretending men can get pregnant when they can't? Fucking disgusting.

R27 - I think you mean 'assigned trans at birth' or whatever bullshit they've come up with this week

"We're raising it not to see gender."

Better teach it to never look down in the shower, R38. They might see their gender! The could cause suicidal ideation!

I like the ones that are already knocked up, so I don't have to worry about it!

Sorry junior, Marky likes to bottom out! You might want to duck or something!

15 years too late, Bitches!

So this trans thing insist she's a man yet want to belong in "Mother's Day" too?

She's wants her trans cake and eat it too.

So this is what it sounds like when bigots cry.

Getting pregnant is probably the most "female affirming" thing you can do. How on earth does this not trigger this person's gender dysphoria? People with actual gender dysphoria (which is cured by therapy training them to [bold]accept[/bold] their actual gender) usually reject anything that defines them as the gender that they actually are. What can be more female-defining than getting pregnant? This is very confusing.

The mental gymnastics to rationalize this must be astounding, it is definitely confusing. I’ve stopped trying to understand any of it. Now they will be raising babies. I’d love to get an invite to the gender reveal party. Imagine the poor SOB that has to break the news during the ultrasound. They is giving birth to it. Delicious.

R41 Kinda old, but I'll do him ... WTF, this is the back door!

1. How is she what looks like at least 6 months pregnant but still maintaining a full beard? She's harming her baby becasue of her mental illness.

2. Is it the non-pregnant partner breastfeeding in the picture a little way down the article? How's that working? Or is that partner just pretending to feed the baby because reality doesn't pertain to this arrangement?

Fucking psychos.

Let me suggest that testosterone shots are not a good idea if you're pregnant with an XX child.

I wanna see some of these babies, after all the hormones have been pumped into them.

[quote] Remember when CK used to use beautiful models in their campaigns?

What I remember about CK campaigns is that they have always tried to do the most predictably controversial thing possible, in order to capitalize on the latest moral panic for publicity reasons. It worked with the child porn-styles campaign and weren't they doing it back in the day putting a very young Brooke Shields in their jeans and having her insinuate that she was panty-less?

Everyone losing their minds here is reacting exactly as hoped by the CK advertising agency.

r44 It's no longer a "female" thing. Pregnancy, abortions, breastfeeding, etc. They have been successfully distorting the language and concepts.

No they haven't. Some crazies on social media (the same as you, R51, just different beliefs they're acting crazy about) are arguing to change the language. It has not been accepted by the mainstream and will not be. No need to panic.

R47, the partner is MTF so can’t really breastfeed.

r52 Is New York Times part of "some crazies on social media"? If this man is a "female", then by the same logic, that mutilated, mentally ill pregnant person is a male... or at least "not female". Hence so many politicians and other liberal types' desperate enthusiasm to remove the word woman (and female) from all these things.

[quote] It has not been accepted by the mainstream and will not be.

R52 Only a matter of time, due to on-going media, government, academia and community organisations social inculcation of translunacy terminology, such as "transitioning", "transgender", "transman", "transwoman", "cis-gender", etc. As well as the normalization of men in dresses as "women" and men who demand to be called women because it's Tuesday and they "feel like women".

r52 Or this Washington Post? "Levine is also the organization’s first-ever [bold]female[/bold] four-star admiral."

As R54 R56 posted, not only are the "liberal" media promoting translunacy, but they're defending it against criticism as well.

From The Independent, 2 April 2022:

"Critics accuse trans swimming star Lia Thomas of having an unfair advantage. The data tells a different story."

Addendum R57 "The NCAA champion has sparked controversy and become a hate figure among conservatives, but statistics show little evidence that [bold]she[/bold] performed any differently to other [bold]women[/bold], Io Dodds reports"

Oh never mind. Is @The White House part of "some crazies on social media"?

Wouldn’t it be correct to say first woman officer instead of first female officer? Woman is gender, female is sex.

It depends on the position of Venus at that particular time but only on the 3rd Sunday of every lunar month, r60.

I can't wait for the video of their child coming out as trans to it's joyous parents.

This MTF is a retired lt colonel and a billionaire.

R3 Agreed.

Trans men who get pregnant is a contradiction of being trans because obviously you weren’t born in the wrong body if you want to be pregnant and birth children.

It's not gay if I start to think about putting my baby in them, is it?

R37, ITA. I can’t believe they still harp on with the “assigned ___ at birth” horseshit. Sex is observed and recorded in the womb, as it is with every pregnancy, ever. A woman can’t just birth a baby and decide whether it’s a boy or girl regardless of genitals. Just another example of their lunacy.

R44, agree with your entire post. And I agree with so many points raised by every other sane reasonable person here. I would love to give credit to everyone individually, but I’m going to credit all of the sane ones who agree that ONLY WOMEN GET PREGNANT!!

This lunacy needs to be stopped.

[quote] ONLY WOMEN GET PREGNANT!!

womxm

r68 I thought you were joking... Ok this is the real latest news

[quote] This MTF is a retired lt colonel and a billionaire.

Not to mention a complete stunner!

ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7pa3TmqOorZ6csm%2BvzqZmraCimq6le5Jpb2txZ2h%2Bbq%2FApa2ipl2guaa1zWafoqxdrLa1tIycqaKsmZi2tLmMqK2eql2lv6azzZqlrWWkp66vv8aepZ2domK6orqMnJimqJGetK8%3D